





UNEMPLOYMENT
INSURANCE / SOCIAL SECURITY
| Issues and Answers | |||
| Employer can recoup excess contributions to employee’s HSA | |||
| Summary of State Law Changes | |||
| Test Your Human Resources Knowledge | |||
| Labor Law Journal Submissions | |||
| Human Resources Links | |||
| Labor Arbitrators' Awards and Biographies | |||

The 2008 U.S. Master Employee Benefits Guide is the ideal reference for HR personnel, benefits professionals, benefits attorneys, payroll managers — or anyone involved in the area of employee health and welfare benefits.
Kentucky's retirement plan, which made age in part a condition of pension eligibility and treated employees differently based on pension status, was not discriminatory based on age since the plan's differences in treatment were not "actually motivated" by age, ruled the High Court in a split 5-to-4 decision.
Several circumstances combined to persuade the Court that the disparate treatment was not motivated by age, including: age and pension status are "analytically distinct" concepts; the possibility that pension status was a "proxy for age" was absent, there was a non-age-related rationale for the disparity, the plan sometimes gave advantage to older workers, the plan did not rely on stereotypes the ADEA sought to eradicate, and it would be hard to correct the disparity and still achieve the plan's objectives.
Subscribers click here.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today.
Employee Benefits Management provides plain English explanations on creating, evaluating, and administering all types of employee benefit plans. Get practical guidance on the full spectrum of employee benefits including health plans, family leave, 401(k) plans, and more. Learn more »
©2008, CCH. All Rights Reserved.
