Products & Training » Labor & Employment Law
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business

Labor & Employment Law

Receive up to date information on Employment Law decisions and practices. CCH covers the full breadth of fair employment practices, labor relations and disabilities law at the federal and state levels and provide customers with comprehensive primary source research materials, annotated explanations and timely updates of current news and developments. Whether you are a high powered law firm that needs the best resources for your current case load or you are a small business that needs answers to state or federal employment law standards, CCH provides a complete solution to all your Employment Law needs.

CCH/Aspen Labor & Employment Law e-LIBRARY

The two leaders in labor and employment law resources, CCH Incorporated and Aspen Publishers, have teamed to bring you the unique electronic CCH/Aspen Labor & Employment Law e-LIBRARY. Written and edited by recognized authorities, each reference delivers the expert, hands-on knowledge you need to effectively manage employment and labor issues, and links federal and state labor and employment laws to thousands of cases, concise explanations and expert analysis. Learn more.

Labor & Employment Law News & Information

What's New

State Employment Law Compare

This new innovative tool uses "Smart Chart" functionality to instantly compare multiple state laws, all at the same time on the same chart.

Summary of Law Updates

Federal Law Changes - Home Pages
State Law Changes - Library
June 2008 Updates
 
» TOPIC SPOTLIGHT «

Supreme Court strikes down California's labor "neutrality" law
A California law forbidding private-sector employers from using state grant monies to assist or deter union organizing is preempted by the NLRA, the US Supreme Court ruled 7-2, reversing an en banc Ninth Circuit decision. Writing for the majority, Justice Stevens noted that the Taft-Hartley Act amended the NLRA by adding Section 8(c), which protects from NLRB regulation noncoercive speech about labor organizing by both unions and employers. As amended, the section manifested a "congressional intent to encourage free debate on issues dividing labor and management" (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v Brown, Dkt No 06-939, 156 LC ¶11,043).

 
» TOPIC SPOTLIGHT «

High Court upholds Kentucky retirement benefits plan
Kentucky's retirement plan, which sometimes treats workers who become disabled prior to qualifying for retirement based on age or years of service more generously than those who become disabled after they could have retired based on age, does not violate the Age Discrimination in Employer Act of 1967 (ADEA), ruled the US Supreme Court. Considering the question whether a plan that lawfully makes age in part a condition of pension eligibility, and then treats workers differently based on their pension status, is automatically discriminatory based on age, the High Court in a 5-to-4 split, concluded the disparate treatment in this case, was not 'actually motivated' by age (Kentucky Retirement Sys v EEOC, Dkt No 06-1037, 91 EPD ¶43,230).